Shipping Manifest Explained: What It Is and Why It Matters
20 December 2025
A Complete Guide to Cargo Insurance in European Freight Forwarding
20 December 2025
OUR GOAL
To provide an A-to-Z e-commerce logistics solution that would complete Amazon fulfillment network in the European Union.
The modern e-commerce supply chain is no longer just about moving a box from Point A to Point B. It is a complex web of efficiency, cost management, and risk mitigation. For e-commerce managers and business owners operating in Europe and globally, the terminology used by freight forwarders can often feel like a barrier to optimization.
Two terms, in particular, cause frequent confusion: Intermodal Transport and Multimodal Transport.
While they are often used interchangeably in casual conversation, in the strict language of logistics contracts and insurance liabilities, they are worlds apart. Choosing the wrong mode—or simply misunderstanding the contract you are signing—can lead to unexpected costs, delayed shipments, and nightmares regarding cargo liability.
This guide goes beyond the dictionary definitions. We will explore the operational, legal, and strategic differences between these two transport models, specifically tailored for the needs of scaling e-commerce businesses.
Why moving goods is rarely simple
Before dissecting the differences, we must establish common ground. Both intermodal and multimodal transport involve moving goods using two or more different modes of transport (e.g., truck, rail, sea, air).
In a typical scenario for a French e-commerce company importing goods from Asia:
- A truck picks up goods from a factory in Shenzhen.
- The goods are loaded onto a ship.
- The ship arrives at the Port of Le Havre or Marseille.
- The goods are moved by rail to a logistics hub near Paris.
- A final truck delivers them to a fulfillment center.
This is a multi-leg journey. The difference lies entirely in how this journey is contracted, who is liable, and how the cargo is handled.
Multimodal transport: The "One-Stop-Shop" approach
Multimodal transport is defined by simplicity for the cargo owner (the shipper). It is the movement of goods from at least two different modes of transport, but—and this is the crucial distinction—it is performed under a single contract.
Role of the MTO (Multimodal Transport Operator)
In this model, you deal with one entity: the Multimodal Transport Operator (MTO). The MTO is not necessarily the person driving the truck or steering the ship. They are often a freight forwarder or a logistics provider who takes full responsibility for the entire journey.
Key characteristics of multimodal transport:
- Single Bill of Lading: You receive one document (Combined Transport Bill of Lading) covering the journey from the factory door to your warehouse.
- Unified liability: If the cargo is damaged, you do not need to figure out if it happened on the ship or the truck. The MTO is liable to you for the entire route.
- Carrier agnostic: As the shipper, you generally don’t care who the sub-carriers are. The MTO selects them.
Why e-commerce businesses choose multimodal
For an online retailer scaling up, time is a scarce resource. Multimodal transport offers a "peace of mind" factor.
- Administrative efficiency: You handle one invoice and one point of contact.
- Tracking visibility: MTOs usually provide a unified tracking system, so you don't have to switch between a shipping line’s website and a trucking company’s portal.
- Communication: If a delay occurs at the port, the MTO handles the re-routing. You are informed of the solution, not just the problem.
Intermodal transport: "Unitized" approach
Intermodal transport also involves multiple modes, but the focus shifts from the contract to the handling unit and the carrier structure.
In intermodal shipping, the goods are moved in a single loading unit (usually an ISO container, swap body, or semi-trailer) that is not opened or unpacked during the transitions between modes. However, technically, intermodal transport often involves multiple contracts with different carriers for each leg of the journey.
Power of the ITU (Intermodal Transport Unit)
The essence of intermodal is that the cargo itself is never touched. The container is lifted off a truck, placed on a train, lifted off the train, and placed on a ship. This reduces the risk of theft and damage significantly.
Key characteristics of intermodal transport:
- Multiple Bills of Lading: typically, you might have a contract with a trucking company to get the container to the rail terminal, a separate contract with the rail operator, and another with the shipping line. (Note: Some 3PLs can bundle this, but legally, the liability often shifts).
- Segmented liability: If damage occurs, you must prove where it happened to claim insurance from the correct carrier.
- Lower handling costs: Because the goods aren't unpacked, transfer costs at terminals are lower compared to break-bulk shipping.
Why e-commerce businesses choose intermodal
Intermodal is often the choice for mature supply chains focused on cost-efficiency and sustainability.
- Cost reduction: By utilizing rail or barge for the long-haul portion of the journey and using trucks only for the "last mile," costs drop significantly compared to road-only transport.
- Eco-friendly: Rail transport emits significantly less CO2 than road transport. For brands building a sustainable image in France and the EU, this is a major selling point.
- Security: Since the container is sealed at the origin and opened only at the destination, pilferage risks are minimized.
Detailed comparison: Operations, legal, and strategic
To make an informed decision for your logistics strategy, we need to compare these two directly across critical business verticals.
1. Legal framework and liability
This is the most "boring" but financially dangerous part of logistics.
- Multimodal: Operates under the "Network Liability System" or a uniform liability regime. If the goods are damaged, the MTO pays you. The MTO then goes after the subcontractor. You are shielded from the backend litigation.
- Intermodal: Often operates under the specific conventions of each transport mode (e.g., CMR for road, Hague-Visby Rules for sea, COTIF/CIM for rail). These conventions have different compensation limits. For example, maritime liability limits are generally lower than road liability limits. If your high-value electronics are damaged at sea, you might recover less money than if they were damaged on a truck, and you bear the burden of proving where the damage occurred.
2. Flexibility vs. coordination
- Multimodal: High flexibility. If a rail strike hits France, the MTO can instantly switch the cargo to a truck without renegotiating the contract with you. They solve the puzzle.
- Intermodal: High coordination required. If you booked the rail leg yourself and there is a strike, you must find a trucking company, negotiate a rate, and arrange the transfer. However, this gives you total control over who handles your goods.
3. Warehousing and inventory flow
For e-commerce, inventory flow is king.
- Multimodal: Better for "Just-in-Time" or unpredictable demand, as the MTO optimizes for speed and reliability.
- Intermodal: Better for planned stock replenishment (e.g., sending 5 containers of winter stock to a warehouse in September). It is predictable and cheaper but less agile in an emergency.
"Green" factor: Environmental impact
We cannot discuss logistics in the 2020s without addressing sustainability. Consumers are increasingly demanding green supply chains, and European regulations are tightening.
Intermodal transport is the champion of sustainability. By design, intermodal transport aims to keep freight off the roads for the longest possible segment of the journey. A standard intermodal route might look like this:
- Road: 50 km (Factory to Rail Terminal)
- Rail: 800 km (Cross-border transit)
- Road: 50 km (Rail Terminal to Warehouse)
Moving freight by rail creates approximately 75% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than moving the same freight by truck. If your brand’s value proposition involves sustainability, structuring your supply chain around intermodal routes is a verifiable claim you can make to your customers.
Multimodal transport can be green, but because the MTO prioritizes the contract fulfillment (often speed or reliability), they may default to air or long-haul road transport if rail schedules are inconvenient.
Real-world scenarios: Which should you choose?
Let’s apply this to typical e-commerce situations to help you decide.
Scenario A: High-volume dropshipper or importer
- Situation: You import home decor items from China to France. The margins are tight, and the volume is high (10 containers a month). Speed is not the primary concern; cost is.
- Verdict: Intermodal. You can leverage the lower costs of rail (the "New Silk Road") or sea freight combined with barge transport up the Seine. The standardized containers ensure product safety, and the cost savings per unit add up.
Scenario B: Fast-fashion retailer
- Situation: You are launching a new collection. You need the goods in your Paris fulfillment center now. Delay means missed sales trends.
- Verdict: Multimodal. You need an MTO who can combine Air Freight with express trucking. You pay a premium for the single contract and the guarantee that one person is responsible for rushing the goods through customs and transfer points.
Scenario C: High-value electronics
- Situation: You are shipping expensive, fragile components.
- Verdict: Multimodal (with caution). While Intermodal offers security via sealed containers, the liability aspect of Multimodal is safer. If a pallet of laptops disappears, you want the simplified claims process of a Multimodal Bill of Lading rather than chasing a trucking company in a foreign jurisdiction.
Role of digital logistics in bridging the gap
Historically, managing intermodal shipments required a team of in-house logistics experts to coordinate the handovers. Today, the line between these two modes is blurring thanks to technology.
Modern Third-Party Logistics (3PL) provider and digital platforms are essentially "democratizing" the benefits of both.
- Visibility: Advanced 3PLs provide real-time dashboards that show where the container is, regardless of whether it’s on a train or a truck.
- Seamlessness: A modern logistics partner acts as the MTO, giving you the single contract simplicity while utilizing intermodal tactics in the background to save you money.
For a business owner, this means you no longer need to choose between "easy" (Multimodal) and "cheap" (Intermodal). You need a partner who understands flexibility—the ability to switch modes based on data, not just tradition.
Strategic agility in your supply chain
The debate between Intermodal and Multimodal is not just about definitions; it is about how you view your supply chain. Is it a cost center to be minimized (Intermodal focus) or a competitive advantage to be optimized (Multimodal focus)?
The reality for most successful e-commerce businesses is a hybrid approach. You might use intermodal transport for your steady-state inventory replenishment to keep costs low and carbon footprints smaller. Simultaneously, you might engage a multimodal strategy for seasonal peaks, urgent restocks, or entering new markets where you lack local logistics knowledge.
In an era of global instability—where canal blockages, strikes, and fuel prices fluctuate wildly—the ability to understand these differences gives you power. It allows you to ask the right questions of your freight forwarder: Are we locked into one mode? Who holds the liability? Is there a greener way to move this cargo?
Ultimately, the best transport mode is the one that arrives on time, intact, and protects your profit margin. By understanding the mechanics of intermodal and multimodal transport, you stop being a passive shipper and become an active architect of your logistics success.
